Anonymised case · Utilities

The right answer was training — not more technology

Upstream prevention and a quantified business case instead of a back-office automation solution.

The challenge

The operational challenge

Smart-meter installation failures created downstream operational work and avoidable demand.

The key question was whether the failure should be prevented upstream rather than processed faster downstream.

The work

What Leania did

  • Used Gemba observation, value-stream analysis and stakeholder discovery.
  • Traced avoidable work to upstream call handling and installation preparation.
  • Developed a business case for targeted training and a small call-time increase rather than new technology.
The evidence

Outcome and evidence

The business case estimated £150,000 benefit by 2020 against approximately £5,000 annual running cost.

The forecast payback was about two months; realised savings were not evidenced.

Forecast business-case value£150,000
Forecast business-case valuePractitioner-reportedForecast by 2020; not independently verified realisation.
Forecast business-case valueApprox. £5,000
Forecast annual costPractitioner-reportedEstimated annual running cost.

← All proof

Which workflow is consuming more capacity than leadership realises?

Discuss a workflow