Evidence, redesign, assurance and verified value

Senior-led, specialist-delivered: Leania remains accountable for diagnosis, requirements, acceptance and value verification, using the client’s existing technology team or vetted specialist delivery partners where build is required.

The engagements

Start small, scale on evidence

Engagements are fixed-scope and sequential: each rung establishes the evidence the next one depends on, and each ends with a decision rather than a commitment to continue.

Rung 1a

Workflow Evidence Sprint

Establish the evidence: what one high-volume workflow actually costs, where delay and rework sit, and whether redesign is worth pursuing.

Duration:
10 business days; typically 4–6 consulting days
Basis:
From £7,500

Workflow Evidence Sprint

Decision produced

Whether redesign of this workflow is worth pursuing: commission the Cost-to-Serve Baseline or Workflow Redesign & Delivery Assurance on the evidence, or stop with the evidence pack in hand.

Rung 1b

Cost-to-Serve Baseline

An agreed baseline: the defensible end-to-end cost of a unit of work, as the reference point all later benefit claims are measured against.

Duration:
3–4 weeks
Basis:
Fixed-scope proposal — scoped and priced after qualification.

Cost-to-Serve Baseline

Decision produced

Whether to commission redesign against the agreed baseline, and which parts of the workflow justify it first.

Rung 2b

Workflow Redesign & Delivery Assurance

Redesign the workflow and assure its delivery: specialist build under Leania's requirements, acceptance criteria and independent quality control.

Duration:
8–12 weeks
Basis:
Fixed-scope proposal — scoped and priced after qualification.

Workflow Redesign & Delivery Assurance

Decision produced

Acceptance of the redesigned workflow into live operation against the agreed criteria — and whether to commission ongoing verification of realised benefit.

Rung 3

Benefit Realisation & Verification

Verify the value: realised benefit measured against the agreed baseline, with each benefit class reported separately.

Duration:
Minimum 3 months
Basis:
Retainer with quarterly verification reviews — scoped once an agreed baseline exists.

Benefit Realisation & Verification

Decision produced

Each period: whether realised benefit is evidenced, attributable and on track — and whether to continue, adjust or conclude the verification retainer.

Who it serves

Who Leania works best with

  • Acquisition-led or multi-office accountancy groups, typically one hundred to a thousand-plus staff, with high client, document or transaction volumes.
  • Specialist insurance brokers, MGAs and insurance-service businesses, typically one hundred to a thousand-plus staff, with high submission, servicing, document or exception volumes.
  • Banking and other regulated financial-services operations where transaction, exception or servicing volume creates material operational cost.
  • Other high-volume business-services organisations where cases, documents, transactions or manual handoffs scale faster than operating capacity.

Operationally complex service businesses where growth, acquisition or transaction volume is creating disproportionate cost, rework or capacity pressure.

PE-backed, independently owned and acquisition-led businesses can all fit where there is a measurable workflow and a live economic trigger.

When firms call

The moments this work starts

  • MTD implementation and quarterly operating cycles
  • Post-acquisition integration
  • Capacity failure
  • Platform migration
  • Margin pressure
  • Failed automation
  • Outsourcing review
  • Complaints or service-level pressure
  • Exit preparation
The boundary

What we do not do

No actuarial, underwriting, tax-technical, legal or audit advice. No audit opinion. No certification of accounts. Where technical build is required, it is delivered by the client's existing technology team or vetted specialist delivery partners against Leania's requirements, acceptance criteria and quality controls.

We do not guarantee a unit-cost outcome that depends on client adoption, volume mix, staffing decisions, data quality or third-party delivery outside our control.

Where outsourcing or relocation is on the table, the discipline is the same: redesign the work before deciding whether it should be retained, automated, outsourced or relocated.

Bring us one workflow and a live trigger.

Discuss a workflow