Evidence, redesign, assurance and verified value

Senior-led, specialist-delivered, with Leania retaining independent acceptance and quality control.

The engagements

Start small, scale on evidence

Engagements are fixed-scope and sequential: each rung establishes the evidence the next one depends on, and each ends with a decision rather than a commitment to continue.

Rung 1a

Workflow Evidence Sprint

Establish the evidence: what one high-volume workflow actually costs, where delay and rework sit, and whether redesign is worth pursuing.

Duration:
10 business days; typically 4–6 consulting days
Basis:
From £7,500

Workflow Evidence Sprint

Decision produced

Whether redesign of this workflow is worth pursuing: commission the Cost-to-Serve Baseline or Workflow Redesign & Delivery Assurance on the evidence, or stop with the evidence pack in hand.

Rung 1b

Cost-to-Serve Baseline

An agreed baseline: the defensible end-to-end cost of a unit of work, as the reference point all later benefit claims are measured against.

Duration:
3–4 weeks
Basis:
Fixed-scope proposal — scoped and priced after qualification.

Cost-to-Serve Baseline

Decision produced

Whether to commission redesign against the agreed baseline, and which parts of the workflow justify it first.

Rung 2b

Workflow Redesign & Delivery Assurance

Redesign the workflow and assure its delivery: specialist build under Leania's requirements, acceptance criteria and independent quality control.

Duration:
8–12 weeks
Basis:
Fixed-scope proposal — scoped and priced after qualification.

Workflow Redesign & Delivery Assurance

Decision produced

Acceptance of the redesigned workflow into live operation against the agreed criteria — and whether to commission ongoing verification of realised benefit.

Rung 3

Benefit Realisation & Verification

Verify the value: realised benefit measured against the agreed baseline, with each benefit class reported separately.

Duration:
Minimum 3 months
Basis:
Retainer with quarterly verification reviews — scoped once an agreed baseline exists.

Benefit Realisation & Verification

Decision produced

Each period: whether realised benefit is evidenced, attributable and on track — and whether to continue, adjust or conclude the verification retainer.

Who it serves

The consulting journey is for operators

  • Acquisition-led or multi-office accountancy groups, typically two hundred to a thousand staff.
  • Specialist brokers, MGAs and insurance-service businesses, typically one hundred to a thousand staff.
  • Organisations of fifty to two hundred staff where transaction, document or exception volume is high relative to headcount.
  • PE backing is a strong buying signal, not a qualifying condition.

Software-only enquiries are not rejected — they belong with the Leania software estate rather than the consulting journey.

When firms call

The moments this work starts

  • MTD implementation and quarterly operating cycles
  • Post-acquisition integration
  • Capacity failure
  • Platform migration
  • Margin pressure
  • Failed automation
  • Outsourcing review
  • Complaints or service-level pressure
  • Exit preparation
The boundary

What we do not do

No actuarial, underwriting, tax-technical, legal or audit advice. No audit opinion. No certification of accounts. Technical build is delivered by specified specialists under Leania's requirements, acceptance criteria and quality controls.

We do not guarantee a unit-cost outcome that depends on client adoption, volume mix, staffing decisions, data quality or third-party delivery outside our control.

Where outsourcing or relocation is on the table, the discipline is the same: redesign the work before deciding whether it should be retained, automated, outsourced or relocated.

Bring us one workflow and a live trigger.

Discuss a workflow